Is Posse Comitatus Dead?

I ran into a few articles today regarding an upcoming deployment of the 1st Infantry Division. Apparently their destination is the United States. This will be the first time since the Civil War that a military unit will be "deployed" within the U.S. borders with a mission other than training. Is this a conflict with the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878? I'm sure not the person to say one way or another; that will be left up to the smart folks in the Justice Department. However; I do have an opinion on it.

What is the problem with deploying forces within the U.S.? Well there's the obvious reason that initiated the Act after the Civil War but those reasons aren't in existence in today's world. We have a standing police force that is well equipped to handle any civil disturbance if it was to rear it's ugly head. But what of the real mission of the Army defending the U.S.? Yes, folks that's why this is coming around. In today's world of terrorist imposed micro-conflicts, it's a smart idea to have a force ready to go in a moments notice to defend us if a terrorist was to try something here at home. Suitcase nukes, dirty bombs, and chemical and biological weapons can devastate our homeland while our Army is focused overseas. Wouldn't it be smart to have someone providing defense at home for these threats? The time of large standing forces threatening our country is pretty much over but that doesn't mean we're not threatened. We need to adapt our force to handle these new threats; threats that do exist, threats that we live with every day.

Police forces are there to enforce the law but are being asked to do more and more defense type of missions. Terrorists don't normally break laws until they blow something up so the pursuit of this enemy by the Police could be construed as a conflict. Yes, I know we have laws about planning terrorist acts but they're pretty broad and hard to enforce. Although these people have declared war on us, we still treat them as criminals and they're not, they are enemy forces in our country to bring down us. The ultimate goal of terrorist forces is the same as if we had an enemy countries army within our borders; the downfall of our way of life. Defending us against this type of threat IS the mission of the Army folks.

Posse Comitatus isn't dead folks. The law has evolved just is our country has evolved and does still have some relevance however the law does have two sides. While it does limit the involvement of the Army in criminal enforcement it also somewhat defines the role of the Police. So let's do what Posse Comitatus intended and let the Police do their job of enforcing our laws, and let the Army do it's job of defending the country.

There's a ton of new pictures at my Picassa site.  Check them out.

What's my Palin name?

Yes, the Palins have a strange way of naming their children.  If I was named by the Palins my name would be:

Falter Locust Palin

If you want to find out what the Palins would have named you check out the blog. :)

Book Banning! Holy Crap it's Fahrenheit 451 all over!

So what is the temperature at which liberals burn?  Well it seems that it's pretty much whatever they want it to be.  In their latest attempt to bring down Sarah Palin, they've resulted to creationism. Creating lies that is; read on...

As I watched FOXnews this afternoon they had a few talking heads on to discuss the election. And, as usual, the discussion turns to how bad Gov Palin will be for the country and how her track record supports their point.  This time the brought up an event early on in the Governor's Mayoral stint in Wasilla when she asked a question of the city librarian concerning some books people had had "issues" with.  This story originally ran in the Anchorage Daily News on Sept 4th, 2008 and outlined events that had happened 12 years earlier.  The story tries to repeatedly find a connection between a discussion at a city council meeting between then Mayor Palin and the librarian and a supposed request from the Mayors office for the librarians resignation.  Well as I've said many times there's a lot more to this than what this left wing rag wants you to think.

After more research I found an article from a more conservative Blog regarding the incident. Michelle Malkin wrote an opposing article concerning the incident and it seems did a better job of putting the events in a more balanced light.  She even went so far as to post the list of the supposed planned books to be banned.  Here's the problem; some of the books on the list weren't even published at the time the events happened. Wow, how could that be?  I'm sure that ADN.com couldn't have been that gullible to be taken in like this.  Well they never actually posted the list, this was found out later on when some of the original sources where pressed a little harder. It seems the lists is from a group at the Florida Institute of Technology and has nothing what so ever to do with Governor Palin.  Yes it's a group against banning book but I don't think there's a FIT-Wasilla, AK connection.  

So what is the bottom line here?  I suspect that this all started because someone got their feelings hurt because she was asked to resign.  Then, the anti-McCain/Palin crowd latched onto it trying to twist it somehow to make the Republican candidate look like a jack-booted Nazi thug.  This is a tired tactic that doesn't work on the educated voter.  The writers use fear mongering to create a disingenuous account of events and their actions are downright despicable.  Shame on them.

No, Ray Bradbury's vision of the future isn't coming.  No, we don't have a new Hitler running in the election.  No Mrs. Palin isn't the anti-christ.  And no, the apocalypse isn't going to happen if the Republicans get elected.  So don't let the chicken-little liberal get away with this smear campaign; be an educated voter, do some research and make up your own mind.

Pork Invaders

Check out this McCain game:

And who says he's out of touch with America? Using an '80s video game to make a point! Brilliant!

Have fun with it but please go to his website and get the truth about the campaign.

Saw this on the internet today: July 11 2008 JONES, EUGENE Eugene (Gene) Jones of Westminster, 86, husband of Frances (Fran), father of Pamela (Pam) Jones-Gonzales, grandfather of Andrew Jones-Gonzales. Visitation Friday 4:00P-7:00P at Horan and McConaty Mortuary, 9998 Grant St., Thornton. Memorial Mass Monday 11:00AM at Spirit of Christ Catholic Community, 7400 W. 80th Ave., Arvada. Inurnment Ft. Logan National Cemetery. Gene was a damn good man; he'll be missed by all that knew him. I wish I would have known about this earlier. :(

Political Hay or a Real Problem?

As I was watching Fox news today they ran a story regarding how much the Political Action Committee (PAC) representing Fannie May and Freddy Mac had contributed to certain Democratic members. They're stance was the top recipients of this money was all Democrat specifically the number 2 person, Senator Barak Obama. Well folks, this isn't my first rodeo so the news wasn't any surprise to me; however I thought it was interesting so I did a little checking myself.  Yes it was as it was reported, the top 6 folks are Democrat but guess what; there are over 350 names on the list. I found the website they had cited as their source (OpenSecrets.Com) and found the entire list and it became very obvious to me that while they had reported correctly they hadn't told they whole story. Here's some data I thought you'd want to see:

Place	Name	Office	Party	Grand Total
1	Dodd, Christopher J	S	D	$165,400
2	Obama, Barack	S	D	$126,349
3	Kerry, John	S	D	$111,000
4	Bennett, Robert F	S	R	$107,999
5	Bachus, Spencer	H	R	$103,300
6	Blunt, Roy	H	R	$96,950
7	Kanjorski, Paul E	H	D	$96,000
8	Bond, Christopher S 'Kit'	S	R	$95,400
9	Shelby, Richard C	S	R	$80,000
10	Reed, Jack	S	D	$78,250
62	McCain, John	S	R	$21,550
217	Biden, Joseph R Jr	S	D	$3,300

 

Now I only put in the top 10 and then McCain and Biden but do you notice something interesting here? The game is tied folks! 6 Dems, 6 GOPs! So what does this tell us? Well since I downloaded the entire list I did some number crunching to see what other truths I could gleam from the data.

If you broke of the money by party it comes out to 42% GOP, 57% Democrat, and 1% Independent. If you changed it around and looked to see if there was a difference between the House and Senate; House 55% and Senate 45%. Hmmm, it looks like the PAC knows how to do math too; remember, Democrats are the Majority right now and, as we all know, the House has more people than the Senate. So do the Democrats have a larger problem, does the house? Nope, they're all equal opportunity leaches.

Now I do have to say it is rather troubling to me to see Senator Obama's name so high on the list considering his time in the Senate but that's not really the point to all of this. So what is the point… None of us should take what we hear on the news as gospel. If we want to know the real truth we need to look for ourselves especially if it's particularly damning towards one person. Don't follow the hype folks, become free thinkers, take responsibility for your own knowledge.

Upcoming Election

Just in case ya'll are wondering, I'm voting for McCain this November. Why? Well for one I've been a Republican for a long time now but mostly because of his track record and some things he's done recently. McCain's track record speaks for itself; his service in the military, his service in the House, and his service in the Senate has all portrayed this fine American as the true leader he is. While Obama talks about needing "change" McCain exudes leadership in way Obama can only dream of. McCains TV add on the day of Obama's nomination congratulating him on reaching this point was profound. It shows McCains ability to put politics aside and do what's right. Was there any response like that from Obama on McCains nomination? No, only more tired democratic rhetoric. When it came to selecting a running mate Obama thought it was correct to choose an entrenched liberal Senator, McCain selected a fresh face. Look at Bidens stance and track record on the important issues of our times ad you'll see the same failed Democrat positions of the past. Granted Palin is a much more conservative Republican than McCain is but she has been fixing the problems in Alaska that mirror our nations problems. She brings to the plate new solutions to old problems, not the tried and failed Democrat solutions of Biden and Obama. So who is the better candidate? Who is showing leadership and not just talk? Who is really demonstrating an ability to facilitate change? You know my answer; do the research and make up your own mind. I welcome your responses.